In associates who take cancer after a few months of smoking isn't it possible they would hold developed cancer anyway

they would have to be pretty suseptible to cancer surrounded by the first place, I thinkIn associates who take cancer after a few months of smoking isn't it possible they would hold developed cancer anyway
Are you trying to maintain smoking here?
you don't get cancer contained by a few months-you just draw from symptoms-you already had cancer
If a soul starts smoking and develops lung cancer several months later - the lung cancer be independent of the smoking. It takes a considerable amount of asphalt and nicotine exposure to cause lung cancer. Physicians speak within terms of 'pack years' of smoking. One pack each day for 30 years is 30 pack years. Two packs on a daily basis for 50 years is 100 pack years. Generally lung cancer is not likely to be due to cigarette smoking surrounded by less than 50 pack years although by 100 pack years more than 10% of smokers enjoy or will develop lung cancer. I am hoping that you are not a smoker.
Smoking isn't the only idea for developing cancer, only subdivision of it. So, yes, they would have developed cancer anyway. There is route to many other circumstances contributing to this epidemic.